This command is sent to the observer by the ship to report the last salvo was fired with incorrected data.

This command is sent to the observer by the ship to report the last salvo was fired with incorrected data.

• A. Standby
• B. Abort
• C. Neglect
• D. Repeat

Answer: (C)

The key idea is how to handle erroneous information in a fire-support communication, specifically what command tells the observer to disregard faulty data. When the ship notes that the last salvo was fired with incorrect data, the directive to the observer should instruct them to ignore that salvo’s data and not act on it. That is exactly what Neglect communicates: disregard the faulty information so the observer doesn’t base any targeting or corrections on it. Standby would only pause actions without addressing the bad data. Abort would cancel the mission or firing entirely, which is unnecessary for just an incorrect datum. Repeat would resend the same information, which would propagate the error rather than fix it. So Neglect is the most appropriate because it directly signals to disregard the invalid data and await proper information.

The key idea is how to handle erroneous information in a fire-support communication, specifically what command tells the observer to disregard faulty data. When the ship notes that the last salvo was fired with incorrect data, the directive to the observer should instruct them to ignore that salvo’s data and not act on it. That is exactly what Neglect communicates: disregard the faulty information so the observer doesn’t base any targeting or corrections on it.

Standby would only pause actions without addressing the bad data. Abort would cancel the mission or firing entirely, which is unnecessary for just an incorrect datum. Repeat would resend the same information, which would propagate the error rather than fix it. So Neglect is the most appropriate because it directly signals to disregard the invalid data and await proper information.